- There are 4 logical relationships in any logical square or hexagon of opposition:
- Contraries can both be simultaneously false, but they cannot both be true at the same time
- Subcontraries can both be simultaneously true, but they cannot both be false at the same time
- The superaltern implies the subaltern in a subalteration relation but not vice versa
- Where 2 statements are contradictories, the truth of one statement implies the falsity of the other
|
FIG: Deontic square of opposition in deontic logic
|
- There are 2 deontic operators in deontic logic:
- O for obligatoriness
- P for permissibility
- Where p denotes a propositional variable describing the performance of an action:
- ∼p means that the action described by p is not performed
- Op ⟷ ∼P∼p (obligatoriness)
- Pp ⟷ ∼O∼p (permissibility)
- Op → Pp (obligatoriness implies permissibility)
- Pp ∧ ∼Op ⟷ Pp ∧ P∼p (optionality)
- Pp ∧ ∼Op ⟷ ∼(Op ⊻ ∼Pp) (optionality)
|
- Suppose that we live in a home world h
- There are n morally acceptable alternative worlds w1,w2,…, wn relative to h
- According to possible world semantics:
- To claim that the action described by p is obligatory (formally: Op) is to assert of that action that it is performed in all morally acceptable alternative worlds w1,w2,…, wn
- To claim that the action described by p is permissible (formally: Pp) is to assert of that action that it is performed in at least one morally acceptable alternative world
- To claim that the action described by p is optional (formally: Pp ∧ ∼Op) is to assert of that action that it is performed in at least one morally acceptable alternative world, though not all of them
|
- Op and ∼Pp are contraries
- Pp and ∼Op are subcontraries
- Op is the superaltern and Pp is its subaltern
- ∼Pp is the superaltern and ∼Op is its subaltern
- Op and ∼Op are contradictories
- Pp and ∼Pp are contradictories
|